Millwork Blog.

Edgebanding part 2

In part 1 we discussed the various edgebanding materials and their pros and cons. As I said though, the material choice is just half of the equation. It's also important to consider the application method, glue, and some of the edge treatments that can reinforce high-wear areas of panels--especially the top edges of doors and drawer fronts.

OK, so here are the pros and cons of various edgebanding application methods and technologies:

  1. Hot-Melt Adhesive:

    • Pros:
      • Fast curing: Hot-melt adhesive bonds quickly, speeding up the edgebanding process.
      • Strong bond: When applied correctly, hot-melt adhesive creates a durable and reliable bond between the edgebanding and substrate.
      • Versatility: Hot-melt adhesive can be used with various edgebanding materials and substrates.
    • Cons:
      • Temperature sensitivity: Hot-melt adhesive requires specific temperature conditions for application, which may be challenging to maintain in certain environments. There are various temperature ratings for different applications, so this can be accounted for somewhat.
      • Potential for stringing: If not applied properly, hot-melt adhesive can produce stringy residue, requiring additional cleanup. This can be limited with proper set-up, and a buffing station--preferably with a mister for cleaning up residue. The build-up on these buffing wheels is something to keep an eye on.
      • Visible Glue Line: while there are different color hot-melt glues for different applications, changing out glue colors is tedious and can be costly. Each different glue color you stock adds to your inventory costs which can get expensive, especially for small shops. If you want a truly seamless edge, the next option is what you're looking for.
  2. Laser Edgebanding:

    • Pros:
      • Seamless finish: Laser edgebanding technology melts the edgebanding material directly onto the substrate, creating a seamless and invisible joint.
      • Precision: Laser technology allows for precise edgebanding application, even on curved or irregular surfaces.
      • Aesthetic appeal: Laser edgebanding eliminates visible glue lines, enhancing the overall appearance of furniture and fixtures.
    • Cons:
      • Cost: Laser edgebanding equipment and technology can be expensive to acquire and maintain, making it less accessible for smaller-scale operations.
      • Learning curve: Proper training and expertise are required to operate laser edgebanding machinery effectively. Plus, since these are specialty machines, repairs and downtime can be costly in facilities without built-in redundancy.
  3. Hi-Pur (High-Performance Polyurethane) Adhesive:

    • Pros:
      • Excellent bonding strength: Hi-Pur adhesive forms a strong and durable bond between the edgebanding and substrate.
      • Moisture resistance: Hi-Pur adhesive is highly resistant to moisture and humidity, making it suitable for applications in wet or humid environments.
      • Fast curing: Hi-Pur adhesive typically cures quickly, reducing production time.
    • Cons:
      • Cost: Hi-Pur adhesive tends to be more expensive than traditional hot-melt adhesives.
      • Specialized equipment: Hi-Pur adhesive requires specific application equipment and expertise for proper use.

Additionally, several edge treatments can increase durability and even lend a sleek modern look to edgebanded fronts:

  1. Kerf-In Edge Pulls:

    • Pros:
      • Sleek design: Kerf-in edge pulls create a minimalist and streamlined look for cabinet doors and drawers.
      • Space-saving: Kerf-in edge pulls are recessed into the edge of the door or drawer, saving space and reducing the risk of snagging.
      • Easy to clean: With no protruding hardware, kerf-in edge pulls are easy to clean and maintain.
      • Easy to service: Kerf-in edge pulls can be swapped out with a couple of screws and a little adhesive in many applications in the event of damage or shifting tastes.
    • Cons:
      • Limited grip: Kerf-in edge pulls may not offer as much grip as traditional pulls or handles, especially for users with larger hands.
      • Installation complexity: Installing kerf-in edge pulls requires precise cutting and fitting, which may be challenging. Whereas traditional screw-on pulls are usually fitted at the end of an installation in the field, edge pulls have to be done in a shop using shop machinery for best results. This requires more planning and coordination ahead of time.
  2. J-Pulls:

    • Pros:
      • Ergonomic design: J-pulls feature a curved profile that allows for comfortable and ergonomic gripping.
      • Modern aesthetic: J-pulls offer a contemporary and stylish look, enhancing the overall design of cabinets and furniture.
      • Easy to clean: J-pulls have a smooth surface and minimal crevices, making them easy to clean and maintain.
    • Cons:
      • Limited design options: J-pulls may not be suitable for every design aesthetic and may limit flexibility in cabinet and furniture styles.
      • Space requirements: J-pulls protrude from the cabinet or drawer front, requiring adequate clearance space for opening and closing.
      • Wooden j-pulls are especially labor-intensive, requiring the pulls to be milled, glued up, then overlaid in veneer for best results. This makes them an ultra-premium option for most shops and cabinet lines.

I hope this helps! Are there other edgebanding topics you would like me to cover? Use our contact form and I'll add them to the queue.